Jupiter Research Makes Some Changes

07/13/2006

Blogger_cartoon_1 Checking blog stats one finds interesting links .. a referral to David Schatsky's, President JupiterKagan, blog. Both  David and Greg Dowling, the Jupiter Research analyst of the infamous Jupiter Research corporate weblog study, provide additional information about the methodology and the results .. some are rather surprising.

Sidebar: If you missed the threads here's a link to the back-story.

David Schatsky's post is titled  Bashed By The Blogosphere For Our Blog Research. My high level take aways .. 

  • Jupiter will do better interfacing with "interested parties" (as long as they don't perceive you to be a competitor).
  • They will look into how to provide more methodology information so "interested parties can better interpret the information." 
  • David will personally talk to Jupiter Research's "PR firm and provide them with clearer guidelines on how to handle inquiries from bloggers in the future, and (he'll) look into providing a bit more information in news releases as well, at least in the versions we post on our site.

Sidebar: If anyone from Jupiter Research or Peter Arnold Associates is popping by (or any other research firm), I suggest you check out the AAPOR Press page for specific guidelines on what an organization is ethically obligated to provide to the public. I had an interesting chat with Tom Guterback, 2006-07 Ethics Chair of AAPOR and director of the University of VA Center for Research, this afternoon. Disclosure of research methodology applies to any publicly cited research finding including media releases.

However, the company is only obligated to provide information the pertains directly to the results revealed. Although Jupiter Research offers general information about the process of their research methodology, it by no means meets the standards of AAPOR Ethic Guidelines for disclosure of specific results.

I strongly encourage anyone who has posted information regarding the results of this study to read Greg Dowling's post.  No one that I read got it right. The "...nearly 70 percent of all site operators will have implemented corporate blogs by the end of 2006." did not refer to marketing or business bloggers but to "Web site decision makers from companies with more than $50 million in revenue."

Directly from Greg's post:
"It should also be noted that the term " "Weblogs" in the context of this report (and press release) does not differentiate between external Weblogs or internal "dark" Weblogs and is referring to the deployment of Weblog authoring technology not the creation of customer facing Weblogs.

To reiterate, the survey respondents were Web site decision makers with budget authority asked about technology deployments, not marketers asked about their use of Weblogs. However, marketers were surveyed for the data point, "Only 32 percent of marketing executives said they use corporate Weblogs to generate WoM around their company's products or services."

I appreciate everyone's support and comments on Diva and on so many great blogs. Thanks to Fard and to Neville for staying the course on this one.  Working together we might have made a difference in the way a company conducts business that will result in a win-win that positively impacts the blogging and marketing research industires. 

As Mack, Dave, Eric and Ann would say this is what it means to belong to a community ~ where the voice of one turns into the voices of many.

Sidebar: Lou woulda liked this one!

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

Trackbacks

Trackback url:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b4b169e200d834614c4369e2

» What is social marketing? Depends on who you ask from Driving In Traffic
This morning I looking at my feeds and came across this post from Nedra Weinreich over at Spare Change.  Jupiter Research has just launched a new Social Marketing research service that will provide marketers and site owners with recommendations... [Read More]

Tracked on Aug 30, 2006 12:53:03 PM

Comments

Toby - Congrats on keeping this campaign going. Yes, I do hope it makes a difference on how people report research for public consumption. Also, thanks to AAPOR for setting these standards and keeping true to them. Now, if we can only get the print media and commercial broadcast media to do the same. That would be a BIG deal.

Posted by: Bill Neal on Jul 13, 2006 8:16:57 AM

Glad to read such a nice piece of information.

Posted by: Paul on Jul 13, 2006 8:21:05 AM

That's pretty darn cool. The voices are being heard and considered.

It's amazing how many stories there are like this on a near daily basis.

Thanks for the update Toby.

Posted by: David on Jul 13, 2006 4:28:24 PM

Great work, Toby! This episode illustrates the growing influence bloggers (using the collective term carefully) have on mainstream media output.

Posted by: Easton Ellsworth on Jul 14, 2006 10:18:10 AM

Thank you, Toby, for holding their feet to the fire. If the mainstream media would just do the same...

Posted by: Martha on Jul 14, 2006 12:13:26 PM

Post a comment